The President of the Senate and about 10 other Senators have been dragged to court
for the role they played in the rejection of Ibrahim Magu.
The Senate President, Bukola Saraki and 10 other senators have been dragged to court by Lagos businessman, Raji Rasheed
Oyewumi, over the rejection of Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu.
Oyewumi filed a suit at the Federal High Court Abuja seeking the nullification of the screening of the Acting Chairman of the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission as he stated that Saraki and the 10 other
Senators mentioned in the suit do not have the right to participate in the screening.
He said the court should declare the screening of Magu on the 15th day of December 2016 without first referring him to the appropriate committee of the Senate as illegal, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.
The defendants in the matter are Saraki, Senators Godswill Akpabio, Jonah Jang, Aliyu Wammako, Stella Oduah, Theodore Orji,
Rabiu Kwankwaso, Ahmed Sani. Danjuma Goje, Joshua Dariye and Adamu Abdullahi.
Others are the Clerk to the National Assembly, the Senate, the Attorney-General of the Federation and the Acting EFCC
chairman.
The plaintiff, through his counsel, Inibehe Effiong, sought the following reliefs: “An order to set aside the screening the screening, votes, proceeding and resolutions of the Senate of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria (the 13th Defendant/Respondent) of Wednesday, 15th March,
2017 as they relate to the nomination or appointment of Ibrahim Mustapha Magu
(the 15th Defendant/Respondent) for the position of Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
“A declaration that the 1st Defendant is disqualified by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as
amended) and the Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended) from presiding over or
participating in the deliberation, screening and voting on the nomination of the 15th Defendant for the position of Chairman of
the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission due to the apparent conflict of interest arising the 15th Defendant’s active role in his ongoing trial at the Code of
Conduct Tribunal.
“A declaration that the 2nd to the 11th Defendants are jointly and severally disqualified by the Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) and the Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended) from participating in the deliberation, screening and voting on the nomination of the 15th Defendant for the position of Chairman of the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission due to the apparent conflict of interest arising from their pending or ongoing cases of financial
and economic crimes given that the 15th Defendant is coordinating and supervising
the investigation into or prosecution for the said financial and economic crimes.
A declaration that the 1st to the 13th Defendants jointly and severally violated the Senate Standing Orders, 2015 (as amended) when they participated in the screening, deliberation and voting on the first or earlier
nomination of the 15th Defendant in the 13th Defendant on the 15th day of December 2016 by not declaring their pecuniary interests in view of their pending
or ongoing cases of financial and economic crimes given that the 15th Defendant is coordinating and supervising the investigation into or prosecution for the
said financial and economic crimes involving the 2nd to 11th Defendants.
“A declaration that the first and earlier rejection of the nomination of the 15th Defendant for the position of Chairman of
the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission by the 1st to the 13th
Defendants on the 15th day of December 2016 without first referring the 15th Defendant to the appropriate committee of
the 13th Defendant and at an executive or closed session instead of an open session is
illegal, null, void and of no effect whatsoever.
“A declaration that the 15th Defendant is entitled to be accorded fair hearing by the
1st to the 13th Defendants during
screening, deliberation and voting in the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria on
his nomination for the position of Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
“An order of injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from presiding over or participating in the screening, deliberation
and voting on the nomination of the 15th Defendant for the position of Chairman of
the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission.
“An order of injunction restraining the 2nd to the 11th Defendants from participating in
the screening, deliberation and voting on the nomination of the 15th Defendant for the position of Chairman of the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission.”
